‘Surveillance State’ is alive, well — and operating against us all

Maybe you once thought the CIA wasn’t supposed to spy on Americans here in the United States.

That concept is so yesteryear.

Over time, the CIA upper echelon has secretly developed all kinds of policy statements and legal rationales to justify routine, widespread surveillance on U.S. soil of citizens who aren’t suspected of terrorism or being a spy.

ADVERTISEMENT

The latest outrage is found in newly declassified documents from 2014. They reveal the CIA not only intercepted emails of U.S. citizens but they were emails of the most sensitive kind — written to Congress and involving whistleblowers reporting alleged wrongdoing within the Intelligence Community.

The disclosures, kept secret until now, are two letters of “congressional notification” from the Intelligence Community inspector general at the time, Charles McCullough. He stated that during “routine counterintelligence monitoring of government computer systems,” the CIA collected emails between congressional staff and the CIA’s head of whistleblowing and source protection.

McCullough added that he was concerned about the CIA’s “potential compromise to whistleblower confidentiality and the consequent ‘chilling effect’ that the present [counterintelligence] monitoring system might have on Intelligence Community whistleblowing.”

“Most of these emails concerned pending and developing whistleblower complaints,” McCullough stated in the letters to lead Democrats and Republicans at the time on the House and Senate Intelligence Committees — Sens. Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinLiberals only care about sexism when it's convenient Five Takeaways from West Virginia's Senate debate Feinstein up nine points in new Senate poll MORE (D-Calif.) and Saxby ChamblissClarence (Saxby) Saxby ChamblissJuan Williams: GOP plays the bigotry card in midterms A hard look at America after 9/11 Lobbying World MORE (R-Ga.), and Reps. Mike RogersMichael (Mike) Dennis RogersJuan Williams: There are too many 'useful idiots' in our politics Alabama House candidate says 55,000 voters in her district have been disqualified Trump's praise for North Korea complicates cyber deterrence MORE (R-Mich.) and Dutch RuppersbergerCharles (Dutch) Albert RuppersbergerAthletic directors honor best former student-athletes on Capitol Hill Hillicon Valley: New FTC chief eyes shake up of tech regulation | Lawmakers target Google, Huawei partnership | Microsoft employees voice anger over ICE contract Lawmakers urge Google to drop partnership with Chinese phone maker Huawei MORE (D-Md.).

The March 2014 intercepts, conducted under the leadership of CIA Director John BrennanJohn Owen BrennanFalsehood shames Clapper, Brennan and pledge to protect whistleblowers Brennan endorses O’Rourke in Texas Ex-CIA chief: Vote to 'reject inflammatory rhetoric' MORE and Director of National Intelligence James ClapperJames Robert ClapperFalsehood shames Clapper, Brennan and pledge to protect whistleblowers Pipe bomb suspect planned attacks for months: prosecutors The Hill's Morning Report — Presented by PhRMA — Trump divides Republicans ahead of midterms MORE, happened amid what’s widely referred to as the Obama administration’s war on whistleblowers and mass surveillance scandals.

Is that legal?

According to the CIA, the spy agency has been limited since the 1970s to collecting intelligence “only for an authorized intelligence purpose; for example, if there is a reason to believe that an individual is involved in espionage or international terrorist activities” and “procedures require senior approval for any such collection that is allowed.”

But here’s where it gets slippery. It turns out the CIA claims it must engage in “routine counterintelligence monitoring of government computers” to make sure certain employees aren’t doing bad things. Poof! Now, all kinds of U.S. citizens and their communications can be swept into the dragnet — and it’s deemed perfectly legal. It’s just an accident or “incidental,” after all, if the CIA happens to pick up whistleblower communications with the legislative branch.

Or maybe it’s a lucky break for certain CIA officials.

The only reason we know any of this now is thanks to Sen. Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyTrump on false Kavanaugh accusation: 'How about the other ones?' Senate panel asks DOJ to investigate 'fabricated allegation' against Kavanaugh Congress must make sentencing reform priority for public safety MORE (R-Iowa), whose staffers were among those spied on. Grassley says it took four years for him to get the shocking “congressional notifications” declassified so they could be made public. First, Grassley says, Clapper and Brennan dragged their feet, blocking their release. Their successors in the Trump administration were no more responsive. Only when Grassley recently appealed to current Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson, who was sworn in on May 17, was the material finally declassified.

“The fact that the CIA under the Obama administration was reading congressional staff’s emails about Intelligence Community whistleblowers raises serious policy concerns, as well as potential constitutional separation-of-powers issues that must be discussed publicly,” wrote Grassley in a statement.

Legal or not, there was a time when this news would have so shocked our sensibilities — and would have been considered so antithetical to our Constitution by so many — that it would have prompted a swift, national outcry.

But today, we’ve grown numb. Outrage has been replaced by a cynical, “Who’s surprised about that?” or the persistent belief that “Nothing’s really going to be done about it,” and, worst of all, “What’s so bad about it, anyway?”

Some see the intel community’s alleged abuses during campaign 2016 as its own major scandal. But I see it as a crucial piece of a puzzle.

The evidence points to bad actors targeting candidate Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpSoros rep: Fox News refuses to have me on Rihanna vows that her songs will never again play at Trump’s ‘tragic rallies’ Midterm vote to set cyber agenda MORE and his associates in part to keep them — and us — from learning about and digging into an even bigger scandal: our Intelligence Community increasingly spying on its own citizens, journalists, members of Congress and political enemies for the better part of two decades, if not longer.

Sharyl Attkisson (@SharylAttkisson) is an Emmy Award-winning investigative journalist, author of The New York Times bestsellers “The Smear” and “Stonewalled,” and host of Sinclair’s Sunday TV program, “Full Measure.”

Similar Articles:

Schneier on Security

Smart cities raise important questions about our privacy rights at home and on the streets where we live

Smart cities raise important questions about our privacy rights at home and on the streets where we live

TSA says air marshals don’t follow ‘ordinary’ travelers. Some ordinary travelers beg to differ

TSA says air marshals don’t follow ‘ordinary’ travelers. Some ordinary travelers beg to differ

The NSA Continues to Violate Americans' Internet Privacy Rights

The NSA Continues to Violate Americans' Internet Privacy Rights