The plan is the latest move by President Donald Trump, who won office in part with his anti-immigrant rhetoric, to remake the nation’s immigration system and make good on his campaign promises as he seeks re-election in November.His administration last year called for the collection of DNA of migrants who are detained by U.S. authorities, arguing it was allowed under a 2005 law and could help detect fraud and solve cold cases.
Friday’s proposal, first announced Sept. 1, would vastly expand such collections that DHS said would help prove family relationships, verify identities, and check criminal histories. It also moves to include children, among other changes.
Critics have said it raises serious privacy concerns.The American Civil Liberties Union last week blasted the move, saying it would hinder legal immigration and raised questions about data storage and government surveillance.“Collecting a massive database of genetic blueprints won’t make us safer — it will simply make it easier for the government to surveil and target our communities and to bring us closer to a dystopian nightmare,” ACLU’s deputy director of immigration policy, Andrea Flores, said in statement.
It is unclear when DHS will finalize the rule. Representatives for the department did not respond to a request for comment. Public comment on the measure is due Oct. 13.The Republican president has repeatedly called for “law and order” ahead of the Nov. 3 presidential election pitting him against former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, a Democrat.Trump has long linked his anti-immigration policies to crime-fighting, although studies show immigrants do not commit crime at a higher rate than native-born Americans.
Reporting by Susan Heavey, Editing by Rosalba O’BrienOur Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
The administration set no specific standards of proof for issuing subpoenas, and officials often justified data collection using “generic” and “cursory” explanations, the IG found.“The information provided [in subpoena documents] often lacks specificity sufficient to establish the particularized facts or basis for connecting the target number to a drug investigation, even if such review had occurred,” investigators said.